<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Segment &#8211; Individual  Medicare PFFS chargeback&#8217;s from Aetna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ritterim.com/2009/12/31/consumer-segment-individual-medicare-pffs-chargebacks-from-aetna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ritterim.com/2009/12/31/consumer-segment-individual-medicare-pffs-chargebacks-from-aetna/</link>
	<description>News and Information affecting Senior Market Insurance Agents.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Violand</title>
		<link>http://blog.ritterim.com/2009/12/31/consumer-segment-individual-medicare-pffs-chargebacks-from-aetna/comment-page-1/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Violand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ritterim.com/?p=3253#comment-3795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about their Dual Advantage Plans?  Can we expect them to do the same on this line of business?  I would hope the logic of their PFFS decision carries over to their dual programs, after all it was their decision to leave this market just like PFFS

Agents have to be thrilled with this decision.  Aetna I am glad I met ya!  Unless I am missing something, I don&#039;t know any carrier that is this fair in these kinds of situations.

I wish they were more competitive in Central PA.  They are the kind of carrier that I want alongside of me in these very uncertain times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about their Dual Advantage Plans?  Can we expect them to do the same on this line of business?  I would hope the logic of their PFFS decision carries over to their dual programs, after all it was their decision to leave this market just like PFFS</p>
<p>Agents have to be thrilled with this decision.  Aetna I am glad I met ya!  Unless I am missing something, I don&#8217;t know any carrier that is this fair in these kinds of situations.</p>
<p>I wish they were more competitive in Central PA.  They are the kind of carrier that I want alongside of me in these very uncertain times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.ritterim.com/2009/12/31/consumer-segment-individual-medicare-pffs-chargebacks-from-aetna/comment-page-1/#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ritterim.com/?p=3253#comment-3793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that info.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

