<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAHU Comments on Impact of Repeal of McCarran-Ferguson Act for Health Insurance Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ritterim.com/2009/10/24/nahu-comments-on-impact-of-repeal-of-mccarran-ferguson-act-for-health-insurance-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ritterim.com/2009/10/24/nahu-comments-on-impact-of-repeal-of-mccarran-ferguson-act-for-health-insurance-companies/</link>
	<description>News and Information affecting Senior Market Insurance Agents.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.ritterim.com/2009/10/24/nahu-comments-on-impact-of-repeal-of-mccarran-ferguson-act-for-health-insurance-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ritterim.com/?p=3039#comment-3355</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree with this comment:  &quot;We view this effort as a political trick designed to distract from the true problem--the rising cost of medical care.  The current bills on the table do little to reduce actual medical care costs, which are the true drivers of the health insurance premiums. &quot;

It is as if Obama and his allies were to see too many house fires, and state as a remedy, &quot;Boy, we sure gotta reform homeowners&#039; insurance.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree with this comment:  &#8220;We view this effort as a political trick designed to distract from the true problem&#8211;the rising cost of medical care.  The current bills on the table do little to reduce actual medical care costs, which are the true drivers of the health insurance premiums. &#8221;</p>
<p>It is as if Obama and his allies were to see too many house fires, and state as a remedy, &#8220;Boy, we sure gotta reform homeowners&#8217; insurance.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
